Skimpy

The House Appropriations Committee, on a party-line vote, advanced the next state budget, sending to the full House a bill that spends $164.5 billion — about $23 billion less than state officials say they need to maintain current services.

It leaves public schools about $8 billion short of what they'd normally expect under current funding formulas, shorts Medicaid by $6 billion, and would cut about 8,000 full-time jobs from the state's payroll. The all funds number is $23 billion short of current spending, a drop of about 12.3 percent.

General revenue spending would drop $4.5 billion, or 5.5 percent, from the current budget. Members can file amendments until Monday.

The House plans to consider the supplemental appropriations bill and a $3.1 billion dip into the Rainy Day Fund on Wednesday — that's to close the deficit in the current budget — and then the 2012-13 budget on Friday, April 1.

The Senate goes next and then the two sides can reconcile their differences — the real writing of the budget — during the final weeks of the session.

A Little Less Skimpy

A day later, the Senate Finance Committee voted 13-2 to add $5.7 billion to their initial proposal for public education spending.

"The base bill was absolutely not acceptable... and there was no one that disagreed with that," said Sen. Florence Shapiro, R-Plano. "We did the best we could and put a significant amount of money back in."

It's still about $4 billion below current funding levels, and there's no money for the 80,000 new students expected to hit public schools next year. Of the total, $5.3 billion will go the the Foundation School Program, the primary source of funding for public schools in the state. The rest goes for textbooks and discretionary grants for pre-kindergarten, programs improving high school completion and college readiness, intervention for struggling schools and students, and teacher effectiveness.

Shapiro, who led the subcommittee that considered the education budget, noted that any education funding depends the passage of a school finance reform bill. Without that, she said, "then none of this works."

Sen. Kel Seliger, R-Amarillo, told the committee that he is working on his own school funding proposal addressing the equity issues he saw in the current plan. He'll have that ready within the next few weeks. "Maybe this tough time provides us both the opportunity and the vision to come out of this with a system that is going to systematically serve the public education system in the future," he said.

Sens. Eddie Lucio Jr., D-Brownsville, and Judith Zaffirini, D-Laredo, expressed concern that the cuts still ran too deep and vote no. State Sen. Royce West, D-Dallas, voted in favor of the bill to move it, but said it still falls short.

Economic Development

If the state spends money, it's good for the economy. If it spends less, it's not good for the economy. That's only one side of the equation — the money it's spending comes from somewhere — but it's the side the Legislative Budget Board is required to watch. So that agency's latest assessment of the budget says what it will cost in jobs without measuring the offsetting impact in the private sector, if there is one.

That budget on its way to the full House would cost the state 271,746 jobs in 2012 and 335,244 jobs in 2013, knocking $11.2 billion and $15.2 billion in personal income, respectively, from each of those years.

The two page report (touted by Democrats and others who don't like this budget) had several caveats (touted by Republicans who are trying to hold the line on spending and who don't want to get pinged for killing jobs). To wit: The LBB says many of the jobs lost can be attributed to the national economic recession, since that recession lowered state revenues, which in turn are the reason for the lower spending level in the House proposal.

The dissents, from Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and House Speaker Joe Straus — the two guys who head the LBB — are that the state doesn't have the money to keep that spending up and that raising the funds to maintain spending would be harder on the economy than the budget cuts.

Map Time

Rep. Burt Solomons hit the gas this week, filing a proposed redistricting map for the State Board of Education and starting hearings in his House Redistricting Committee on what the next House map should look like. He didn't have a map for the latter, which meant most of the seats in the Capitol Auditorium remained empty.

Just wait.

Solomons says he's been collecting maps and requests from members. Several places will be able to write "drop-in" maps for self-contained areas that can be added to the full state map — dropped in — later. Dallas County, where there are 16 incumbents and enough population for only 14 of them, is an example. None of the House districts jumps the county line, so Solomons can leave a square hole there. The survivors can bring him a map in a few weeks.

West Texas has been the subject of a lot of conversation, and the conventional wisdom is that two seats will have to go. But Warren Chisum, R-Pampa, indicated he won't run again, and Tom Craddick, R-Midland, says he's drawn two maps that would give the other incumbents in that part of the state districts from which to run. No pairs. How? He won't say, other than to offer, "It can be done."

Legislative districts, unlike congressional districts, can deviate from precisely even population, but you have to make it up somewhere else. The ideal Texas House district will have 167,637 people in it after redistricting. You could shave more than 8,000 people from each district in West Texas and get to what the former speaker is talking about, but you'd have to get someone somewhere to accept a bigger than optimal district. It's possible, and it's been done, but you have to ask the big district that's giving up some representation: Why'd you do it?

The Senate is fiddling with maps but doesn't have any hearings set (at this writing); at the moment, it looks like congressional mapping could start on that side of the rotunda. The decennial visits from members of the Texas congressional delegation ("Hey, there, how's my best friend?") are well underway. Our favorite sighting: U.S. Rep. Lamar Smith, R-San Antonio, standing behind his former aide, Joe Straus, on the House podium during the Voter ID debate. Smith was talking to Rep. Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi, who was intently drawing a map in the air for Smith.

Inside Intelligence: Redistricting

The insiders, asked this week about redistricting and how it will affect other issues, are split on the outcome. Slightly more than half — 54 percent — think the Legislative Redistricting Board will have to clean up after the Legislature fails to come up with maps for the House and Senate (congressional maps skip that step and go straight to the courts if lawmakers can't agree on plans).

The Republicans have 101 members in the House and 19 in the Senate, but only 9 percent of the insiders think lawmakers will be able to draw maps that ensure future supermajorities in both the House and the Senate. Almost half — 48 percent — think that effort will fall short in both houses; 10 percent say it'll work in the House and not the Senate, and 20 percent say it'll work in the Senate and not in the House.

How will lawmakers split the four new congressional seats? Most of the insiders — 54 percent — say three of those spots will go to Republicans, while 37 percent think it'll be two for each side.

The full set of verbatim answers to our questions is available in our Files section, but here's a sampling:

Do you think the Legislature will adopt new Texas House and Senate maps, or that the Legislative Redistricting Board will have to do it for them?

• "Everyone will play nice. They don't want the current statewides who are all jockeying for the next new office to be holding them hostage."

• "Why would a House Republican vote for a map with 85 safe R seats? Go explain to your local Republican women's club why that was a good vote. We started with 101 and I voted to help return 85."

• "The Legislature will adopt a House map — the Senate may not be able to adopt a Senate map."

• "Drawing districts for 101 Republicans when the most fevered dreams of Tom DeLay only resulted in the high 80s will be a problem, but the budget will probably eat up so much time and capital that the legislature will have to punt."

• "I think after jacking around with the budget, the members will be more than happy to tackle some self-preservation."

Can Republicans draw maps that would ensure super-majorities of two-thirds or more in the House and Senate?

• "Difficult but not impossible. The real question is; if Republicans use their magic drawing skills and are able to draw a super-majority, for how long can they hold on to those seats? The party has not realized that it's a new Texas with a clear demographic shift."

• "They big hurdle is Voting Rights pre-clearance."

• "Way too risky to try. Could lose 20 House seats as soon as 2012, and 3-4 Senate seats over a decade. Bets strategy is to firm up viable GOP majorities for another 10 years — at least 17 safe senate seats, 80 or so House seats."

• "Only if Obama, Reid and Pelosi continue to endear themselves to the 'average' Texans."

• "That won't happen. The 2010 mid-term elections were an outlier. It would be borderline criminal for Republicans to assume that 101 (only 99 of them elected as R's) House Members is a proper bellwether for Texas' political proclivities."

How will the new congressional seats be split between Republicans and Democrats?

• "Three-quarters of population growth over the last ten years has been among Hispanics. Hispanics are expecting that growth to be recognized with more Hispanic majority seats and will be disappointed if that does not happen. Republicans will not want to look like they are actively trying to suppress the political impact of Hispanics. The two new majority Hispanic districts that will then likely go Democrat in 2012 will look a lot like Martin Frost's old district in the DFW area and an even more Hispanic version of Solomon Ortiz's district around Corpus."

• "The growth of Hispanics and their protested class status and their affinity for the Democrats will insure two seats go to them."

• "Either 2-2, or 3-1 Republican, depending on how aggressive the Republicans decide they can be."

• "I think 2-2 is the likely split, given Bill Flores and Quico Canseco sitting in formerly D seats. It will be hard, but not impossible, for the mappers to protect Blake Farenthold. Throw those 3 seats in with the 4 new ones, and I think all but the most fire-breathing fire-breathers would be thrilled with 4 or 5 pickups out of 7 seats total."

How will redistricting affect the Legislature's other business?

• "Eat up a lot of time that would otherwise go to other crappy legislation."

• "It will make the budget harder to finish before the end of the regular session."

• "I think the budget is more likely take time and attention away from redistricting than the other way around."

• "There will be a little less lovemaking."

• "Republicans will be more polite worrying that some offense they make will end up costing them their seat. Democrats will be free to be as obnoxious as ever."

• "Redistricting will kill a lot of other bills. Whether members can pass maps or not, they are going to spend a huge chunk of time trying to do so. That means less time for other bills in a session in which the budget has already sucked most of the air out of the room. I am glad to be playing mostly defense this session."

• "It won't."

• "How won't it?"

• "Unclear. I think that significant Republican majority makes it less divisive than the last redistricting cycle. I think that the budget will have a bigger impact on the Legislature's overall business."

• "As soon as maps are released, everything will come to a screeching halt. Getting a budget done will become difficult as it usually is in a redistricting year."

Voter ID: It's Not Over Yet

As Republicans celebrate their first victory in the long road to fixing what they say is the state's busted elections system, Democrats are coming together, licking their wounds and preparing for their next fight — in court.

House Republican Caucus leader, Larry Taylor, R-Friendswood, said Wednesday's grueling debate over voter ID on the House floor was just the beginning.

"This is an important first step in making sure our elections in Texas are secure," he said at a news conference Thursday morning. Just minutes later, Democrats confirmed what they had hinted at all week, that their next step is to alert the Department of Justice.

"Absolutely," said state Rep. Eddie Lucio III, when asked if his party was gearing up for a legal challenge to the voter ID bill, Senate Bill 14. The bill, authored by Sen. Tommy Williams, R-The Woodlands, and sponsored in the House by Rep. Patricia Harless, R-Spring, requires voters to show a valid form of ID before casting a ballot and is said to be the most stringent of its kind in the country.

When the bill is signed into law, as is expected after going back to the Senate and possibly to a conference committee after that, Lucio said, his colleagues will allege that the bill will hinder the voting rights of Texans, specifically minorities and the elderly, and violate provisions of the Voting Rights Act and Civil Rights Act. Lucio pointed to arguments made during Wednesday's nearly 12-hour debate, when Democrats specifically questioned Harless as to whether the bill would adversely affect that constituency. Her remarks were vague or very general on purpose, he said, because opponents were asking that their exchanges be entered into the official House record. It's the same reason Democrats worded their opposition so distinctly — to lay the groundwork for a court battle and have evidence in hand.

It was a foregone conclusion for House Republicans that they would win the battle given their supermajority in the lower chamber. And the morning after the debate, they acknowledged that Democrats actually made some sense in their arguments against the bill.

State Rep. Rafael Anchia, D-Dallas, argued repeatedly that the bill does nothing to address voter fraud. The problem is with mail-in ballots, he argued, not voter impersonation. Taylor said his party's next steps would be to address those issues, too. He said to expect debate on at least seven additional voting-related bills.

"There is no perfect system. I am sure there is some way that people could cheat," he said.

House Speaker Joe Straus, R-San Antonio, said he didn't have any idea when the bill would go to conference, assuming the Senate doesn't concur with the amended version of its bill. But he acknowledged there would be movement soon. After all, Gov. Rick Perry did declare the item one of five emergency items this session.

The Week in the Rearview Mirror

The Texas Education Agency says that a disk containing thousands of Laredo students' Social Security numbers is missing. The Laredo ISD sent the data at the request of researchers at the University of Texas at Dallas; it included almost 25,000 Social Security numbers of current and former students of the district. While the package was signed for at TEA offices, it never reached its destination — the office of a former director of educational research and policy who is no longer with TEA.

In the latest round of state vs. national environmental regulators, the Railroad Commission voted unanimously against the Environmental Protection Agency's conclusion that gas driller Range Resources contaminated water wells in North Texas. The commission's investigators stuck by their assessment that a natural geological formation caused the presence of the benzene, methane and other toxic gases found in the wells. A court case is pending as the EPA seeks to enforce its emergency order.

Taking a stand against legislation they say would cost taxpayers too much, El Paso County commissioners took an official vote against four pending immigration related bills in the House. Commissioners and local law enforcement officials see the potential laws as placing too much of a burden on them, and at considerable taxpayer expense. The bills cited would require law enforcement officers to perform various checks of the immigration status of detainees and prisoners.

Hidalgo County is planning to challenge to official census results, claiming that its population was undercounted by hundreds of thousands of people. County officials have hired attorneys to develop a case while also pursuing negotiations with the bureau to revise the population total upward. County officials claim that 95 percent of colonias in the county did not receive standard census forms.

Trying to prepare for massive cuts to their budget, Texas Tech University officials have realigned their administration, eliminating three high-profile positions. The cuts are expected to save Tech half a million dollars per year. Departments under the three affected employees were reassigned, with some of the responsibility now falling directly to the president, Guy Bailey, who announced the changes.

Dan Neil conceded to Democrat Donna Howard in the House District 48 race just days after a House committee turned back his challenge to the November election results. The Republican challenger lost the election by 16 votes. A recount lowered the margin to 12 votes and he took his challenge to the House. Rep. Will Hartnett, R-Dallas, was chosen to oversee the challenge and found, after poring through records and interviewing voters, that Howard won by four votes. That finding went to a committee on Tuesday, and the panel voted to stick with Hartnett's conclusion. Neil had the right to take the matter to the full House, but decided not to do so. Now Howard is taking advantage of a loophole in campaign finance laws, which ordinarily ban fundraisers while lawmakers are in session, to raise money to cover the costs of the election recounts and Neil's challenge to the count. She's got an Austin event coming up in the first week of April.

Gov. Rick Perry was fined $1,500 by the Texas Ethics Commission for failing to report rental income from a house in College Station, and for filing incomplete information regarding debts on the same property, in personal financial statements required by state law. Perry did not, as the law requires, report income in excess of $500 from rent. According to the Ethics Commission, the total undisclosed income from 2009 and 2010 was between $7,000 and $29,995. Perry also did not disclose all of the debts and the names of banks holding notes and leases on the property.

Bill watch: The Senate version of the Railroad Commission sunset bill cuts the number of commissioners to one from three. The House leaves it at three. The industry is split, as is the commission itself: Michael Williams, who's leaving, thinks it should be a one-commissioner show; Elizabeth Ames Jones and David Porter like it like it is.

Political People and Their Moves

Rob Johnson, who currently serves as Gov. Rick Perry's deputy chief of staff, will depart in April to join Newt Gingrich's presidential exploratory effort as a senior political adviser; if that turns into a real (non-exploratory) campaign, he'll be the campaign manager.

Rick O'Donnell, recently hired as non-teaching special adviser to the University of Texas System Board of Regents in what proved to be a controversial move in parts of the UT Nation, has been reassigned to the position of senior assistant for research. Funding for his new position runs out in August.

Gov. Rick Perry appointed Douglas Wilson of Pflugerville as inspector general of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. Wilson is deputy inspector general of operations for HHSC and former deputy director of the Attorney's General Medicaid Fraud Control Unit.

The governor also appointed:

Elsa Alcala of Houston as judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Alcala is a justice of the 1st Court of Appeals in Harris County and former judge of the 338th District Court there.

• Three members to the Texas State University System Board of Regents. Jaime Garza of San Antonio is a plastic and reconstructive surgeon in private practice, a clinical professor at the University of Texas Health Science Center Department of Surgery, and assistant dean of South Texas Programs at the UTHSC School of Medicine. Rossanna Salazar of Austin is managing partner of ROSS Communications Inc., and a former spokeswoman for then-Agriculture Commissioner Rick Perry. Donna Williams of Arlington is vice president and program manager of Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Inc.

Wanda Rohm of San Antonio and Keith Morrow of Southlake to the Texas Department of Information Resources. Rohm is the retired founder and owner of Presto Business Cards Inc. Morrow, who's being reappointed, is a consultant and owner of K. Morrow Associates LLC.

• Three members to the Upper Colorado River Authority. Jeffie Roberts of Robert Lee is a self-employed tax professional and rancher. Hyman Sauer of Eldorado is president and CEO of the First National Bank of Eldorado. Hugh Stone of San Angelo is a rancher. Roberts and Sauer are reappointments.

Jay Zeidman of Houston to the One Call Board, which has authority over the "Call Before You Dig" systems that notify underground facility operators of excavation plans so that pipelines and utility lines can be marked to prevent accidents. Zeidman is a graduate student at the Rice University Jesse Jones Graduate School of Business.

D. Joseph "Joe" Meister of Dallas as chairman of the Texas Public Finance Authority. Meister is an attorney with K&L LLP. The governor also appointed Billy Atkinson Jr. of Sugar Land is a certified public accountant and partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP; Mark Eidman of Austin, a principal at Ryan, a tax consultancy, and a partner at Scott, Douglass and McConnico LLP; and Robert Thomas Roddy Jr. of San Antonio, president and CEO of Bensco Inc., board chairman of Lone Star Capital Bank and former director of the San Antonio branch of the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank.

• Three members to the Commission on Jail Standards. Allan Cain of Carthage is an independent business property owner and former police officer for the City of Longview. Stanley Egger of Tuscola is Taylor County commissioner, director of First State Bank in Tuscola, and a rancher. Michael Seale of Houston is executive director of health services for the Harris County Sheriff's Office.

Quotes of the Week

Rep. Rafael Anchia, D-Dallas, during voter ID debate Monday: "If illegal immigrants are really infiltrating elections, they must be voting straight-ticket Republican."

Rep. Patricia Harless, R-Spring, after being asked by Anchia if she was confused and needed him to repeat one of several questions he fired in her direction during the debate over the voter ID bill: "I am a blonde. That happens sometimes."

House Appropriations Chairman Jim Pitts, R-Waxahachie, after his committee passed a proposed budget that's $23 billion smaller than the current budget: "I think there's a lot of members of the House who'll say, ‘This is as far as we can go.'"

Cal Jillson, a political science professor at Southern Methodist University, to the San Antonio Express-News, on Gov. Rick Perry: "Since he can't control the process, he's been out playing politics — shoring up his own base and telling the Tea Party that there's a lot more cutting to be done before you go to the Rainy Day Fund. He knows that's not true."

Rep. Lyle Larson, R-San Antonio, in his email newsletter to constituents: "There still has not been a commitment from the leadership to use any of the 'rainy day fund' for the nearly $27 billion projected shortfall in the next biennium. It's becoming pretty clear that folks up here could have used a Dave Ramsey starter kit a few years ago!"

U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Surfside, on the nation's public schools, quoted by Reuters: "They start with our kids even in kindergarten, teaching them about family values, sexual education, gun rights, environmentalism — and they condition them to believe in so much which is totally un-American."

House Corrections Committee Chairman Jerry Madden, R-Plano, to the Austin American-Statesman on a state prison program that allows inmates to work toward college degrees: "We don't provide free college tuition for anyone else like this, so with the budget crisis we're facing, why should we for convicted felons?"

Rep. Richard Raymond, D-Laredo, after learning that a diskette containing the Social Security numbers of every student in the Laredo Independent School District went missing after researchers at the University of Texas at Dallas asked for the information: "Why the hell does UT-Dallas need Social Security numbers from kids in Laredo?"

U.S. Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Pennsylvania, on hobbyists drawing redistricting maps on the Internet, quoted in The Wall Street Journal: "Isn't technology wonderful? Some guy from California drew a map. In Pittsburgh, there are two words for that: 'Who cares?'"

Roland Swenson, executive director of the SXSW festival, quoted in the Austin American-Statesman after four people were hurt by a falling camera boom: "This is our 25th year, and we've never had anyone permanently injured."

Contributors: Julian Aguilar, Reeve Hamilton, Ceryta Lockett, David Muto and Morgan Smith


Texas Weekly: Volume 28, Issue 12, 28 March 2011. Ross Ramsey, Editor. Copyright 2011 by The Texas Tribune. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission from the publisher is prohibited. One-year online subscription: $250. For information about your subscription, call (512) 716-8600 or email biz@texasweekly.com. For news, email ramsey@texasweekly.com, or call (512) 716-8611.

 

The Week in the Rearview Mirror

Put two items on your list of things for interim committees to do when the legislative session is over. House Ways & Means Chairman Harvey Hilderbran, R-Kerrville, says lawmakers will do a full soup-to-nuts review of the state's tax structure after this session of the Legislature. Taxes are dangerous politically right now, but some folks inside and outside the government think one of the biggest problems with the state's finances is a tax architecture that doesn't fit the times. He says they'll look at all the taxes, fees, exemptions, what-nots, and you-name-its. And Burt Solomons, R-Carrollton, followed his release of a proposed redistricting map for the State Board of Education with a call for remodeling of that board during the interim. His complaint is with the size of the districts. With 25.1 million people in Texas, each of the 15 SBOE members represents a district with an ideal size of 1,676,371. There are 12 states with populations smaller than that. Solomons thinks they're too big to represent. He doesn't make any suggestions about fixing it, but two come to mind: Increase the size of the board, or replace it with an appointed panel and ditch the big-district elections altogether.

The House is scheduled to take up the full budget on Friday, and members filed more than 400 pages of amendments in advance of that debate. Here's the electronic version.If you're like us (a little bit of a nerd, in other words), you'll want to follow along at home. So we've scanned and uploaded the full set of pre-filed amendments, available here in total, if you want the whole schmear in one document, or in sections, corresponding with the 11 articles in the state budget. The budget itself is available online from the Legislative Budget Board or at this link, and the summary — a long but very useful write-up of what's in the proposal in laudably clear language — is available from that same agency, or at this link. Friday's debate is expected to last into Saturday.

The Texas House started with a $164.5 billion budget and should end up with the same total. But on Friday (and into Saturday) and starting up again this afternoon, they're making little and big changes inside the spending plan.The debate began first thing Friday morning, carried into the first hour of Saturday when lawmakers wrapped up education and social services, and is supposed to resume this afternoon with Article 4. The essentials have remained the same, with an overall plan that's 12.3 percent smaller than the current budget, that leaves public education and health and human services spending short of what it would take to maintain current services, especially given population growth and inflation, and that requires none of the remaining $6 billion in the state's Rainy Day Fund or any new taxes (though it does include $100 million in new fees). Appropriations Chairman Jim Pitts, R-Waxahachie, characterized it as a draft that will be changed over the next two months. House Speaker Joe Straus emphasized process, telling members, "We need to move this bill." Once it's finally approved, it'll go to a Senate that's on track, at this midpoint, to spend more money than the House. And the reconciliation of those two disparate notions of state government will frame what's left of the legislative session. If they can't find middle ground, it could go into overtime in special sessions after the regular session ends on Memorial Day. The votes on the budget amendments went pretty much the way the Republicans in charge wanted them to go on Friday, just as they did on Thursday, when the House considered two pieces of legislation designed to fill the $4.3 billion deficit in the current budget. The Friday debate focused on three major parts of the state budget: General government, health and human services, and education. Democrats, left after Election Day with fewer than a third of the votes in the House, don't have the juice to make any changes by themselves. That left them with a strategy of voting against the Republicans on most things. And when the majority offered them unpleasant choices — as in a series of amendments that cut family planning dollars and gave the money to autism and other programs Democrats favor — to cast "present, not voting." They were neither for nor against on those issues. For the Democrats, it was a way of disowning a Republican budget. For the Republicans, it was the difference between winning by a 2-to-1 margin and winning by near acclamation. That says something about how the state representatives see the political risks here: If they were worried about future general election contests against Democrats, Republicans would be breaking away from the pack as local politics required. Instead, they ignored the Democrats and stuck to voting in favor of cuts and against more spending. Two votes broke the pattern. One would move $3.5 million from the Texas Commission on the Arts to the Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS); it passed by just six votes, 67-61, with Pitts and former House Speaker Tom Craddick among those on the losing side. "It's the right thing to do," said Rep. David Simpson, R-Longview. "I have nothing against the promotion of the arts, but Austin is doing well on its own. It's the music capital of the world, and we put the weak among us, those who are dependent, first." Another would have moved $1.5 million from the governor's film and music marketing budget into state aid for libraries. It failed 79-55, with Pitts again on the losing side. Both of those votes broke the Republican-Democrat pattern that prevailed on most of the votes on budget amendments. Members began working quietly right after the arts vote to bring it up later for reconsideration, but couldn't find enough support to change the outcome. Conservatives successfully raided family planning funds in the budget, stripping money from those programs and sending it to others, including one for autism, another for mental health services for kids and yet another for trauma care. Several of those choices were framed awkwardly for Democrats, who voted "present, not voting" rather than register a choice that had them choosing one favorite program over another. "We don't choose between good and bad," said Rep. Wayne Christian, R-Center. "We choose between necessary and necessary." Rep. Sylvester Turner, D-Houston, was on the other side of that argument and started the non-voting with this line: "I will not be caught trying to decide whether to fund child one or child two." The debate on education issues lasted six hours. Members took money from the public school system for Texas prisons and put it into community colleges. They turned back an attack on the Texas Education Agency that would have whacked its funding and cut the commissioner's salary to $50,000 from $186,000. "I don't know any of us that go home and say hip hip hooray for the TEA," said Burt Solomons, R-Carrollton, the author of that amendment. But after opposition from a fellow Republican, House Public Education Chairman Rob Eissler of The Woodlands, the House voted to leave the agency alone. Another from Democrat Harold Dutton of Houston also fell short, after he expressed his vision for the agency as, "one guy and one phone." Democrat Pete Gallego of Alpine tried a front-loading amendment, moving money from the second year of the two-year budget to the first in the hope that the Legislature will find money for the second year before it arrives. That fell far short of being added to the budget. Before the House stopped early Saturday morning, they started a series of votes that, for the first time in the day, split Republicans from Republicans. One debate started a buzz inside and outside the Capitol, when Christian tried to require "family and traditional values centers" at colleges and universities where any state money supports gender and sexuality centers or any "other center for students focused on gay, lesbian, homosexual, bisexual, pansexual, transsexual, transgender, gender questioning, or any other gender identity issues." That was adopted, overwhelmingly, by a 110-24 margin. The next debate was ugly, when Christian proposed requiring that colleges and universities getting state funds should make sure that at least 10 percent of their courses "provide instruction in Western Civilization." The line formed quickly at the back microphone, where members can question people who are at the chamber's front mike presenting legislation. Christian got flustered in his descriptions of what would and wouldn't qualify as western studies. Asked by Rep. Borris Miles, D-Houston, whether that would include African-American or Asian-American studies, Christian suggested the first might belong in African Studies. Miles, who is black, implored him, "Let's take this down, brother." But it went to a vote, with Christian and 26 fellow Republicans voting for it and 108 other House members voting it down. Contributors to this story include Emily Ramshaw, Morgan Smith, and Thanh Tan

No charts go with this week's Inside Intelligence survey — it's all text. We asked the experts what they think of the state's top three leaders so far this legislative session. Who do they think is a standout — positive or negative — and ought to be getting the attention of Paul Burka and the other writers and editors putting together Texas Monthly's biennial list of Best and Worst state legislators? And which of the freshmen in the House and Senate — and there are a lot of freshmen this time — are making names for themselves, for better or for worse?It's a mixed bag. Our full set of verbatim answers is available here. Some samples follow. We're past the halfway point of this session. What's your take on the top leaders — Gov. Rick Perry, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, and House Speaker Joe Straus? • "Too early to tell." • "Straus - A+... Dewhurst - B +... Perry - D" • "Perry is in his own universe, Dewhurst is workmanlike at best and Straus can't get very far on anything." • "Lt. Gov. Dewhurst is beginning to pull his weight; the others haven't shown up much." • "Has Perry done anything that he wasn't expected to do? Other than give up a little bit more than $3 billion from the Rainy Day Fund, hasn't this been the Rick Perry we were promised? Straus also has to be a pleasant surprise to the Tea Party and radical right-wing forces that opposed him. Straus has played their tune to a T. The Dew...well, the Dew has been the Dew...no leadership and a bit feckless." • "They are 'toeing' the Tea Party line very well, at the expense of 'Joe and Jane' Texan. They are astute politicians, not statesmen." • "Woo. They have huge majorities and still haven't passed Voter ID." • "Perry - another good session and a great launching pad for the national stage... Dewhurst - another good session and a great launching pad for a US Senate campaign... Straus - proved his leadership abilities and solidified his conservative credentials while maintaining his easy going style and allowing the House to conduct its business without a heavy hand." • "Perry is playing politics... Dewhurst has yet to prove he will really confront the crisis but is making goods noises... Straus is still letting the Instant Tea Bunch run the Circus" • "Fortunately, you identified the individuals by name in your questionnaire. Otherwise, I would not have thought to include them in my take on the 'top leaders' at the halfway point this session. See answers to this question under question #2." "What members of the Legislature are stand-outs so far — one way or another? Who should Paul Burka be watching for his biennial Best & Worst list, and why? • "Best will be Dan Branch and John Carona. Worst will be Stef Carter." • "Worst - Riddle, Berman. Paxton, Schwertner... Best - Solomons, Carona, Deuell, West, Shapiro, Eltife... Furniture - Birdwell, Jackson M," • "Good- Madden, Hilderbran, Whitmire, Bad- Martinez-Fischer, Berman, Riddle, Patrick" • "Too early" • "Chairman Zerwas has been courageous and smart about both his state health care exchange bill and the Rainy Day Fund. Rep. Villarreal has had the sharpest message. Chairman Pitts has done a good job in very difficult circumstances." • "Best- Pitts Zerwas and Deuell... Worst- Caraway Schwertner and Riddle" • "Shapiro; Branch" • "Shapiro, Wendy Davis, Royce West" • "Jim Pitts, Steve Ogden, Tommy Williams" • "Best---Will Hartnett; Worst: Byron Cook, Sid Miller, Scott Hochberg" • "Steve Ogden Best Jim Pitts best" • "Best - Ogden, Duncan, Deuell, Huffman, Nichols, Zerwas, Pitts, Villareal, Gallego... Worst - Carona, Patrick, Williams, Smithee, J. Jackson, F. Brown, Miles" The freshman class is huge this year. Who's most promising, and who's not? • "There are a number of freshman that are showing themselves to be leaders, Connie Scott, George Lavender and Lanham Lyne are all in that category." • "Good - Lyne, Larson, Kuempel, Gonzalez... Worst - Schwertner, Huberty, S Carter" • "Way too early." • "Larry Gonzales and Naomi Gonzales" • "Promising- Huberty ... Not- White" • "Reps. James White, Lance Gooden are among the most promising." • "Lance Gooden on the house side deserves some scrutiny for freshman of the Year. Eric Johnson is also getting some good reviews." • "John Kuempel - he's not a nut" • "Most - J. Rodriguez, Aliseda, Davis, Four Price, Gooden, Lozano... Not - Landtroop, Burkett, Perry, Simpson" • "Dan Huberty - a great command of the issues. Hard work and integrity. This will pay huge dividends... Larry Gonzales - sooo much to offer... Jason Isaac - ''white light''. What was he thinking? ... Freshmen against Straus." • "Four Price is most promising. Doc Anderson is the least - wait, he is not a freshman." • "Sen. Birdwell is a serious person, a conservative and has a compelling personal story. He's kept his head down and could be capable of big things in the future."

Political People and their Moves

Quotes of the Week