The Democratic caucuses in Texas are looking more and more like a scene for a battle between lawyers for the Party and the presidential campaigns.The Clinton campaign's attempt to stall the delegate counting from the Texas caucuses failed; the Texas Democratic Party plans to go forward as planned. The Democrats say they'll hold their county and senatorial district conventions at the end of the month and tally the delegate voting that took place in Democratic precinct caucuses on Election Night. The caucuses could produce more votes for Barack Obama — who lost the popular vote in the Texas primary — than for Hillary Clinton, who won. Her campaign — questioning the security of the ballots — wants to verify signatures on the precinct vote sheets before counting. "As you are no doubt aware, there are significant questions about whether the precinct conventions were conducted in accordance with the Party’s Delegate Selection Plan and Rules," they wrote, over the signature of former Texas Land Commissioner Garry Mauro. "On the night of the caucus itself we brought many instances of these irregularities to the attention of the State Party. The campaign received in excess of 2,000 complaints of rules violations, indicating widespread violations of the Party’s rules..." Clinton's folks complain in the letter that the TDP is leaving it to the campaigns to verify the signatures themselves, but leaving them far too little time to complete the job. In their reply, signed by TDP General Counsel Chad Dunn, the Democrats say only precinct chairs have the legal right to qualify voters. The job's already done, and the proper spot for appeals, they say, is to the credentials folks at the party's convention. They also contend they don't have the legal right to move the conventions set for the end of the month; those dates are locked in by state law.

Bloggers are still pre-analyzing the pending results from the Democratic presidential primary-caucus. They're also discussing the U.S. Senate contest, state House developments and the top Harris County prosecutor. And at the end, a rodeo.

* * * * *

Caucus-sure

Hillary Clinton is asking the Texas Democratic Party to postpone county caucuses until the March 4 count is settled to her liking. The Dallas Morning News's Trail Blazers says, "Why are they doing this? Because they are losing." Texas Observer Blog writes: "For now, it looks like what was a historic night for Texas Democrats could well end up as a nasty court battle."

Burnt Orange Report says that following through on Clinton's request would mean breaking the law, and posts the letter from the Clinton camp, spurring a lively discussion in the comments section. Meanwhile, Texas Kaos's refinish69 pens a note to Clinton: Dear Hillary, I don't like you anymore.

KVUE's Political Junkie has a photo essay on the Democratic presidential campaigns in Texas, while PoliTex, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram's blog has YouTube videos of caucuses around the state.

Off the Kuff looks at cross-tabs for the Democratic primary in Harris County, concluding that whether a person supported Clinton or Obama did not affect down-ballot turnout. Meanwhile, Republican pollster Mike Baselice throws cold water on assertions that Republicans crossed over to vote blue, says Postcards from the Lege, the Austin American-Statesman's blog.

Walker Report has photos from the Bexar County Democratic Party's canvassing of the primary vote. John McCain supporter and San Antonio pastor-televangelist John Hagee says he loves Catholics so much that he married one, according to Trail Blazers. And Texas "superdelegate" Bob Slagle is very ill with cancer, reports Texas Politics, the Houston Chronicle's blog.

* * * * *

Is It Possible?

The Democratic Senate Campaign Committee might be taking a look at Rick Noriega's challenge to incumbent John Cornyn, from the appearance of this YouTube video posted at Burnt Orange. More information from Half Emptyhere.

Burnt Orange's favorite former Democratic Senate candidate, Ray McMurrey, endorses Noriega here. (No word yet from Gene Kelly.) Chronic chips in its two cents in this post here. And PoliTex reports on the BFFs here. Meanwhile, Noriega has swapped out Austin fundraising consultant Kim Taylor for Washingtonian Jennifer Treat, reports Postcards.

* * * * *

Craddick and Friends

Political Junkie sums up the state of all things Tom Craddick in a pair of posts here and here. Texas Politics has an interesting item concerning EmpowerTexans, posited as a purportedly pro-Craddick political committee, and an imbroglio over a commercial posted on YouTube concerning the GOP race to replace retiring state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, R-Temple. (One wonders, though, whether a YouTube video could have any noticeable effect on voter behavior in a state House runoff).

Eye on Williamson takes a peek at the race to replace Mike Krusee in House District 52. It's a four-parter: 1) Democrat Diana Maldonado received a lot more votes than the Republicans did; 2) The two remaining Republicans, Bryan Daniel and Dee Hobbs are against the Trans Texas Corridor but not necessarily toll roads; 3) The two pachyderms favor lower taxes, school vouchers and tough immigration enforcement; and, 4) Maldonado, who's been on the school board, does not like school vouchers.

Fresh off his defeat of incumbent Pat Haggerty, El Paso's Dee Margo has started fundraising for his November date with Democrat Joe Moody, according to the El Paso Times's blog Vaqueros & Wonkeros. Meanwhile, Dos Centavos relays a letter from Democrat Joe Montemayor in HD-127. He'll face Republican incumbent Joe Crabb.

* * * * *

D.A. = Don't Ask

Tex Parte Blog reports on the legal proceedings in regard to former Harris County D.A. Chuck Rosenthal. (Apparently he's going with the "I don't remember" defense.) Life at the Harris County Criminal Justice Center blogs on interim D.A. Ken Magidson here. And here, a writer who doesn't give such a flattering portrayal of Magidson.

* * * * *

Barrel Racing

Burnt Orange clowns Republican state senate staffer Todd Gallaher, who got caught doing impersonations on the job. (More from Kaoshere.)

Burnt Orange prods readers for their opinions on which candidates they should endorse in runoffs.

For the tenderfeet, Kuff has a primer on Harris County Democratic runoffs.

Capitol Annex rounds up Congressional scorecards from three organizations that generally don't like Republicans.

Capitol Crowd's "Best in Show" for the past couple of weeks: Staffer Reshma Charles and analyst Mark Shewmaker.

PBR (Pabst Blue Ribbon) and other kinds of alcohol are way more popular among young Texans than are illicit drugs, according to Grits.

Half Empty thinks that U.S. Rep. Nick Lampson, who'll be facing a Republican in the fall, is trying to brand himself as a GOP-friendly Democrat with his recent support for a Republican-driven border security bill. (Dos-Centavos calls him "bigoted.")

Cintra/Zachry has worked out the entry fee that will go to TxDOT in order to start building the TTC, according to muckraker, who's also got the all-around summary for the history of State Highway 130. More from Texas Politics here.

Texas Blue interviews Dr. Ludwig Otto, who has cowboyed-up to run as a Democrat for Congressional District 6.

He's a beaver, not a bronco, but Buc-ee has his own blog, via Texas Safety Forum.

And Headline of the Week, because it fits in with our theme, is from Observer for a story on a showdown between a law dog and a south Texas newspaper, titled: "Sheriff Tramples First Amendment."

This edition of Out There was compiled and written by Patrick Brendel, who hails from Victoria but is spending the spring in the mid-Atlantic region. We cherry-pick the state's political blogs each week, looking for news, info, gossip, and new jokes. The opinions here belong (mostly) to the bloggers, and we're including their links so you can hunt them down if you wish. Our blogroll — the list of Texas blogs we watch — is on our links page, and if you know of a Texas political blog that ought to be on it, just shoot us a note. Please send comments, suggestions, gripes or retorts to Texas Weekly editor Ross Ramsey.

The state GOP says Rep. Hubert Vo, D-Houston, accepted and didn't report corporate contributions to his campaign; they've complained to the Texas Ethics Commission and to Harris County prosecutors.

Vo's campaign manager says the contributions were not from a corporation and were properly reported. The party's complain says Vo held a fundraiser at Lot 8 Salon and that he accepted in-kind contributions in the form of supplies for that party. The complaint also says the business offered coupons to people who came to the fundraiser. Candidates in Texas races can't take corporate or union money, and the coupon stuff has prompted complaints against Vo before. Karen Looper, with his campaign, said the complaint has no merit: " Hubert Vo paid for the event in question. No in-kind contribution was made, none was reported, and our campaign report is true and accurate." Vo will face Republican Greg Meyers of Houston in the November election.

• Randy Dunning picks up an endorsement from former U.S. House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Flower Mound. Dunning's not running for Congress, but for the Texas House; he's in an HD-112 runoff with Angie Chen Button. One shot against her: She gave money in past election years to Democratic House incumbents from Dallas.

She's shooting back with endorsements from eight Republicans who served on the Garland City Council with her opponent. And her camp is sending reporters and others a press release, with footnotes, detailing odd votes and behavior from Dunning. Among other things, she says he's against public education, has likened DWI stops to "Nazi Gestapo tactics," and voted for two tax increases while he was on the council.

• You can say the same thing about contributions, as it turns out, about House Speaker Tom Craddick. He gave $250,000 to a political action committee that in turn gave money to Democratic incumbents in primaries this year. And his lawyers have U-turned — as reported by the Austin American-Statesman — on earlier statements that he wasn't in on the final destination of that money. His daughter and campaign advisor, Christi Craddick, wrote a letter directing the TexasJOBS PAC to dish some of the money to Reps. Kevin Bailey, Dawnna Dukes, Kino Flores, and Aaron Peña. All four are Democrats who've supported Craddick for Speaker. Bailey, Flores and Peña each got $50,000; Dukes refused the money. On Election Day, Bailey was the lone loser from that group.

• And that leads nicely to this: Four rivals of House Speaker Tom Craddick went to Odessa to endorse Rep. Buddy West, who's in a GOP runoff against former state District Judge Tryon Lewis. Reps. Delwin Jones, Jim Keffer, Edmund Kuempel and Jim Pitts all traveled to the Permian Basin for a campaign appearance. Lewis has said he'll support Craddick for another term as speaker.

• Mindy Montford, running for Travis County District Attorney, got a nod from Rick Reed, who finished fourth in Round One. That race featured four assistant DAs running for the top job, currently occupied by Ronnie Earle, who decided not to seek another term. Montford finished second and now has Reed's help. Rosemary Lehmberg, who finished first, earlier got the endorsement of third-place finisher Gary Cobb. That DA is just like everyone else's, but with a little something extra: It's the first stop for prosecutions against misbehaving public officials and political scoundrels.

• Congressional candidate Pete Olson picked up an endorsement from the Eagle Forum PAC. He's in a runoff with former U.S. Rep. Shelley Sekula Gibbs in CD-22.

• The authors of the new (and so far, the only) biography of the late Bob Bullock will be and center at a panel discussion at the LBJ School next week. That'll feature the writers — Dave McNeely and Jim Henderson — and a mess of luminaries: Former Lt. Gov. Bill Hobby, former House Speaker Gib Lewis, and current state Sen. Rodney Ellis. They'll talk about Bullock and his impact, and probably tell some stories. A signing of Bob Bullock: God Bless Texas will follow.

Round Two of the Texas Democratic primaries comes a week from Saturday, in senatorial district and county conventions.

That's the next step in their delegate selection process. They'll collect and tally the results of the precinct conventions that were held in polling places on Election Night and send that stuff to the Texas Democratic Party. The results won't be final, though, until they're accepted at the party's state convention in Austin in June.

The places aren't all picked (they'll be posted on the party's website), but here's the breakdown: The conventions will take place at the county level in counties where the state senator serves more than one county. In counties that have more than one senator, the conventions can be held (it's not required) in senatorial districts. Those multi-senator counties are Bexar, Brazoria, Chambers, Collin, Dallas, Denton, El Paso, Galveston, Fort Bend, Harris, Hidalgo, Jefferson, Montgomery, Smith, Tarrant, and Travis. The other 238 counties will have county conventions.

The conventions are open to everyone, but the people selected at the precinct conventions do the voting. And depending on who shows up and who doesn't, the results could be different on March 29 than what they appeared to be on March 4. Delegates elected next Saturday go on to the state convention.

The number separating Republicans Doug Miller and Nathan Macias is now 29 (The vote canvass in HD-73 added six votes to Miller's total and 15 to Macias'). That difference comes out to just about one vote in a thousand.

Now they'll start the recount requested by the incumbent, Macias, who won in a squeaker two years ago and is trying not to lose in another. There are four counties and all sorts of voting methods from paper to electronic to optical scanning to local mixes. The count will go this way: Bandera County on Monday, Kendall and Comal on Tuesday, and Gillespie — where most of the complaints started — on Wednesday. The winner will face Democrat Daniel Boone and Libertarian Saannon Beckett McCracken in November.

Nothing like a proposal to cut $262.8 million from a state program to get negotiations going.

The Public Utility Commission staff recommended that 66 percent cut to the state's Universal Service Fund (we first wrote about the case last summer), which was set up ten years ago to subsidize phone service in high cost areas of the state (like rural areas were customers are far apart and expensive to reach with wire lines).

The USF has a couple of parts; the staff would cut the fund used to reimburse four large companies for their costs in those areas, to $132.1 million annually from $394.9 million. The money comes from a 4.4 percent tax on every phone bill in the state. The biggest beneficiary — AT&T — has been the loudest advocate for leaving the fund alone. The amount each company gets now is a trade secret redacted from the PUC's public filings. The staff recommendation would pay them only $3.3 million a year, and a spokesman for the company referred to that as a 98 percent cut (do the math, and they're getting about $165 million a year now). In the staff proposal, AT&T would go from being the biggest beneficiary of the fund to the smallest. The PUC's been hearing from a handful of lawmakers, too, who take the phone company's side and say they don't want the fund cut.

AT&T's competitors — the loudest are cable and telecom affiliates of Time Warner — say the USF provides AT&T in particular with more money than it needs to serve those high-cost areas. AT&T's starting position was that it actually needed more than it was getting and that the high-cost areas were financial losers for the company.

The three-member PUC is scheduled to hear the case next month. But the staff recommendation — issued while we and maybe you were distracted by the elections — prompted a round of negotiations that could change what goes to the commission. As we went to press, everyone involved in the case — with the exception of AT&T — was working feverishly on a settlement that would lower the amounts paid each year to the four big companies (the others are Verizon, Windstream Valor, and Embarq). AT&T is asking the commission to throw the talks to a mediator.

The question now — we're reading between the lines — is how much will be cut from the fund overall, and how much will be cut from whatever is paid to each of those four companies to provide service in high-cost areas. The staff proposal that whacks AT&T's annual cut would give Verizon $15.4 million, Windstream $100.2 million, and Embarq $13.1 million.

The commission could look at that request for a mediator within the week. And next month (assuming there's no delay), the commissioners will take a crack at the whole case, or whatever is left to decide after the current negotiations end.