A proposal to level education spending for more Texas school students split the Senate Finance Committee, prompting a walkout by a handful of Republicans who said it was unfair to districts with higher property values. Meanwhile, the House was rejecting -- on technical grounds and without a vote -- the Senate's changes to legislation that forces new tax revenues to be used for school property tax reductions. Those two bills and the momentarily endangered tobacco tax increase are all on their way to the full Senate.Sen. Florence Shapiro, R-Plano, led the walkout after trying to strip the Senate's changes and stop further changes. A surprised looking Sen. Steve Ogden, R-Bryan, wouldn't let her proceed, and she responded by leaving, followed by Sens. Kim Brimer of Fort Worth, Bob Deuell of Greenville, Kyle Janek of Houston, Jane Nelson of Lewisville, and Tommy Williams of The Woodlands. Ogden and Shapiro had stood next to Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst a day earlier when Dewhurst told a press gaggle that stripping the legislation back to the House version wasn't an option the Senate would consider. But Shapiro tried to do it anyway, removing everything the Senate had added the bill, including teacher pay raises, high school achievement money, uniform school start dates and a number of education measures. Ogden said he hit the brakes because he thought stripping the bill would kill it, and with it, the chance for a school finance fix in this special session. The walkouts included several of the Republicans who were angriest when 11 Democrats left for Albuquerque a couple of years ago to block congressional redistricting. The Republicans were careful to say they hadn't denied the committee a quorum and that work could continue in their absence. That differentiated them from the Democrats, for good and ill: They didn't stop the process, but they didn't stop the proposal they were against, either. Shapiro was trying to block an amendment by Sens. Robert Duncan, R-Lubbock, and Todd Staples, R-Palestine, that would increase the percentage of students in what's called "the equalized system" to 96 percent from 90 percent. It would also block richer districts from adding locally raised money to their own budgets until the poorer districts catch up with them. The poorer districts, in the meantime, would be allowed to use those local enrichment monies. That, according to Shapiro, was unfair. She told reporters she would rather kill the whole bill -- including property tax relief and pay raises for teachers -- than pass it with the Staples/Duncan proposal on board. Janek said the bill that started the day treated all the districts fairly and that's why he opposed the amendment from Duncan and Staples. Shapiro was blunter: "The purpose of this special session is to deliver property tax reduction and address the court's concerns; not create a personal piggy bank for certain members." She said the amendment created big state obligations in the "out years" -- the years after the current budget is over, when more and more students are brought into the system. And she said it wasn't fair to restrict local funds in some districts while allowing them in others. Ogden was asked by a TV reporter what he would say if Shapiro prolonged the walkout until the evening news: "Come home, Florence." But after lunch, Shapiro's Half Dozen were back in their seats. The amendment they didn't like was added to the bill, and the committee voted to send it to the full Senate for a vote. That last vote was 9 ayes, 2 nays, and 3 present-not-voting. Sen. John Whitmire, D-Houston, summed it up when they were done: "We're trying to get Iraq to go to this system." HB 2 -- the lockbox bill -- goes back to the Senate for fixes after the House decided Senate changes had departed from the original subject of the bill. That's a battle for next week. And the Senate Finance panel overcame an impasse on cigarette taxes, sending that legislation to the full Senate with a promise that the floor debate will include efforts to cut the tax hike from $1 to 65 cents, or to phase it in over three years. Also on deck are a couple of amendments over how to tax smokeless tobacco; you can refresh your memory on that one by clicking here.