The 30-day (state) and quarterly (federal) reports are all on file now, so we've updated this and filled in the blanks where reports were missing. Some summary info is in order: In the four congressional races we're watching, Democrats have outraised Republicans $7.8 million to $5.3 million and held a $1.1 million advantage in cash-on-hand at the end of the reporting period. In three Senate races on the radar, Democrats have outraised Republicans, but the number to watch is cash-on-hand, where Republicans held a $2.8 million advantage at the end of September. And in the Texas House, Democrats outraised Republicans from July to September, pulling in $2.9 million to the Republican candidates' $1.8 million. The advantage in cash-on-hand? The Democrats, with about $1 million more than their opponents.

Republican Pete Olson now says he's got proof he wasn't the Pete Olson who voted in a Connecticut election in 2003.Olson, who was then an aide to U.S. Sen. John Cornyn says he located travel documents that show he was reimbursed for travel (airfare, lodging, food, etc.) to Texas on the same day he was shown voting — by voting records in Connecticut — to be casting a ballot on the fate of a local psychiatric hospital. Olson, who wouldn't comment for our earlier story on this, says in a written statement what his staff said for him a week ago. "As I clearly stated before and as these documents clearly show — I was in Washington, D.C. on August 12th and traveled to Texas — thus I could not have voted in Connecticut." Olson was registered to vote in Virginia at the time. And the allegations arose when the Lone Star Project — a Washington, D.C.-based political operation that supports Texas Democrats — filed a criminal complaint accusing him of breaking Virginia law by voting in another state while registered in Virginia. Olson's opponent is U.S. Rep. Nick Lampson, D-Stafford, one of the national GOP's top targets in Congress.

Houston political consultant apologized Allen Blakemore apologized for a mailer accusing former Judge Joan Huffman of taking excessive time off from her court. But the mailer that made the charges is in the hands of voters, and it's not clear the apology will have that same reach. Huffman's camp put the blame on Austen Furse, a Republican rival for the SD-17 seat whose campaign — like that of the Best for Texas PAC — is being run by Blakemore. Furse, according to Huffman, asked to meet "under a streetlight across from the Southside Police station" to apologize. They want him to apologize to each of the 55,000 people they say got that mailer. Their apology, in full:

Best for Texas – Correction & Apology Houston — Best for Texas, a political action committee, last week published campaign material claiming that while Judge Joan Huffman was Judge of the 183rd State District Court, she took an average of 78 days of vacation each year. "New information has been presented to us," said Best for Texas political director Allen Blakemore, "and we now understand our earlier assertion to be untrue. To Judge Huffman and her supporters, I apologize. We were not diligent enough in our research." "We had compiled the data on visiting judges from the State Comptroller's Office. We had compiled the data on holiday court closings from the District Clerk. We compiled data on judicial conferences and retreats. Additionally the criminal courts in Harris County have certain customs regarding the period between Grand Jury terms at the end of each quarter. "The matter of exactly how much vacation she took remains a question. But it is quite clear that the number is not 78 days, nor is that number close. "We did not make the charge without forethought. We had conducted research and believed our claim when we made it. We were, however, in error. "In the past 48 hours, Judge Huffman's campaign has released two sets of records – one from the Administrative Judicial Region of Texas indicating that she took 115 days of vacation during her 6.4 years on the bench – and another from the Administrative Office of the District Courts indicating that she took 123 days of vacation during the same period. This underscores the difficulty in conducting this kind of research," Blakemore said. "It was never our intention to make any false claim about Judge Huffman's record. We have removed the erroneous material from our website. I hope Judge Huffman will accept our apology," Blakemore concluded.

Democrat Ernie Casbeer, who's challenging Rep. Sid Miller, R-Stephenville, launched his air campaign with this spot:

Republican Joan Huffman's newest ad finds her on a climbing wall while an announcer touts her experience and swats at Democrat Chris Bell as a candidate who has run several losing elections. They're among the six candidates running in SD-17, where Sen. Kyle Janek resigned.

Democrat Chris Bell has a new ad that responds, without naming her, to Republican Joan Huffman's latest spot. In hers, he's a candidate who's run "again and again" and lost. In his, "it's unbelieveable" that someone would engage in negative campaigning "after all we've been through."

With early voting about to begin, bloggers focused on the races at the top of the ballot — for U.S. Senate, Congress and the Presidency. They rated and re-rated and berated the matchups on the ballot. And we've collected some miscellany, too.

* * * * *

Mano a Mano

The Houston Chronicle's Texas Politics, live-blogged the latest debate between incumbent U.S. Sen. John Cornyn and Democratic challenger Rick Noriega, but didn't put all their observations in one post. So you'll have to click here and scroll down. (Neither won the debate, they conclude.)) Alternatively, click here for tweets from Postcards from the Lege, the Austin American-Statesman's blog.

Noriega lost the debate, according to Lonnie Walker's Blog, partly because he committed this cardinal sin of politics: "On more than one occasion, Noriega agreed with Senator Cornyn." (Lonnie Walker declares victory on Cornyn's behalf here.)

After watching the debate, BurkaBlog says Noriega has become a much better candidate since the beginning of the campaign: "I thought he was impressive. If he had $5 million and five weeks, he might make a race of it." [eds. note: Burka was one of the questioners at the debate.] And PoliTex, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram's blog, notes that Cornyn avoided mentioning the name of Pres. George W. Bush.

Daily Kos is touting a Research 2000 poll that has Noriega on Cornyn's tail, 50-44 (with 2 percent Libertarians and 2 percent undecided), and saying it's up to the Clintons now to push the Democrat over the edge.

Texas Politics, has reactions to the poll from the Cornyn and Noriega camps, and chips in its own two cents too: "Cornyn's on the cusp of winning but can't seem to close the deal. Noriega has potential but can't seem to capitalize on it."

The Dos Centavos family went to a Noriega rally in Dallas featuring Bill Clinton and took a bunch of photos. And Trail Blazers, the Dallas Morning News's blog, reports on another Noriega surrogate in Dallas, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson.

The Austin Chronicle's newsdesk (nee Chronic) got Noriega to clarify his position on nabbing Osama Bin Laden on Pakistani soil. And Off the Kuff has an interview with Noriega.

* * * * *

House of Repute

Incumbent U.S. Rep. John Culberson, R-Houston, gets busted, sort of, by ABC-13's "truth-o-meter" for claims about Democratic Challenger Michael Skelly in a commercial, relays Greg's Opinion.

National Democrats are lending more support to Doherty, says KVUE's Political Junkie. And Texas Politics shares some "hard-hitting" mailers from Democratic challenger Larry Joe Doherty's campaign linking incumbent U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul to former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay.

Burka says the National GOP canceled $900,000 in ads to Congressional District 22 challenger Pete Olson because it's a higher priority to protect incumbents Culberson and McCaul. Following up on allegations of voter fraud, Half-Empty says Olson, while living in Virginia, cast an absentee ballot for a Connecticut election, so Olson's alibi that he was in Texas is moot (they're chasing us on that one).

The Austin Chronicle backs Democratic challenger Brian P. Ruiz against Republican incumbent John Carter, but forgot to put the endorsement in the print edition of the paper. And Eye on Williamson links to a TV spot featuring both candidates for three minutes apiece.

* * * * *

Prez Clippings

The Star-Telegram live-blogged the debate between Presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama with a couple of columnists and a professor. Capitol Annex did it all by themselves, and so did Texas Blue. And Texas on the Potomac chatted with readers during the debate.

PoliSci@UST lets us know about a new presidential poll tracker out of Princeton University. Meanwhile, the Houston Chronicle's Texas on the Potomac gives perspective on the mothership's endorsement of Obama (also here). And In the Pink Texas talks about a screening of "The Choice 2008," a documentary on the campaign.

* * * * *

Touts, Pro & Con

Burnt Orange Report updates its predictions on House races, Senate races and federal contests. Here's the latest from Annex on "hot" Senate contests. And here's the Young Conservatives of Texas' complete list of endorsements, via Memoirs From a Young Conservative.

Burka uses a newly learned method he calls "The Predictor" to forecast the results of House races. The results: Michael "Tuffy" Hamilton for the win, Bill Zedler in trouble, Dan Barrett and Mark Shelton tied, Tony Goolsby in trouble and Robert Miklos on the heels of Mike Anderson. Wilco Wise responds, "Horsefeathers."

Railroad Commissioner Michael Williams, who's also the chair of Texas Republican Victory, talks to Texas Politics "about whether the national political trends will hurt state Republican candidates."

For a third time, incumbent Sen. Kim Brimer, R-Fort Worth, ducked a debate with Democratic challenger Wendy Davis, reports PoliTex. And the Austin Chronicle says Eileen Smith (the Pink Lady) is Austin's best political blogger of '08 and that Burnt Orange is the best political blog.

Grits for Breakfast has more information on possible plans for the Texas Youth Commission by Sen. John Whitmire, D-Houston. Half-Empty cries foul over changing polling locations in Fort Bend County. And Tex Parte Blog writes about the first application of Jessica's Law in Texas.

Via Policy Spotlight, here's an Empower Texans PAC video featuring HD-107 GOP challenger Bill Keffer. Meanwhile, Kuff interviews HD-127 Democratic challenger Joe Montemayor and HD-133 Democratic challenger Kristi Thibaut. And the El Paso Times's Vaqueros & Wonkeros has videos of both parties' candidates in HD-75 and HD-78.

---

This edition of Out There was compiled and written by Patrick Brendel, who hails from Victoria but is semi-settled in Austin. We cherry-pick the state's political blogs each week, looking for news, info, gossip, and new jokes. The opinions here belong (mostly) to the bloggers, and we're including their links so you can hunt them down if you wish. Our blogroll — the list of Texas blogs we watch — is on our links page, and if you know of a Texas political blog that ought to be on it, just shoot us a note. Please send comments, suggestions, gripes or retorts to Texas Weekly editor Ross Ramsey.

The new spot from Republican Lyle Larson is a response, blasting U.S. Rep. Ciro Rodriguez for saying Larson would raise taxes. Larson says that title belongs to the incumbent.

State Rep. Hubert Vo, facing a stout challenge from Republican Greg Meyers, is on TV with a spot calling the challenger a "typical politician."

The new advert from U.S. Sen. John Cornyn — his seventh this election cycle — has him walking through a sorghum field in Nueces County...

Houston Republican Greg Meyers aims right at his opponent, Rep. Hubert Vo, in a spot called "Had Enough."

The Texas Association of Business plead guilty to making an illegal direct corporate campaign contribution, paid a $10,000 fine, and ended a six-year criminal case that started with TAB's work to get a herd of Republicans elected to the Texas House in 2002.

The group followed its court appearance — which included an apology — with a defiant letter blasting the lame-duck district attorney whose been after them for all these years. "Six years of political persecution by Ronnie Earle has come to an end with a misdemeanor over a bookkeeping error. Hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars that could have been used to protect our streets have been wasted. The bottom line is that the free speech rights of corporations and associations to inform the public on how their elected officials represent them are completely upheld."

The case started when TAB's political action committee, with corporate donations, sent out a flood of "educational" mailers about the candidates in nearly two dozen House races. Travis County prosecutors said the mailers — and the activities of TAB president Bill Hammond and lobbyist Jack Campbell — amounted to illegal corporate participation in state elections. The two sides have been battling over the details of that accusation for six years.

"The law in Texas is clear," Earle said. "Texas citizens, the people of Texas, are entitled to a voice in democracy; corporations are not, just as they are not entitled to vote."

Indictments related to the mailers were dismissed earlier. This settlement closes the last remaining indictment in the case. Earle, who didn't seek reelection, leaves office in January.

Hammond was more contrite in his court-ordered statement after pleading guilty: "I now recognize that while working as a salaried employee of the Texas Association of Business, it was a violation of the law to expressly advocate for the election of these candidates."

A related case involving the Texans for a Republican Majority political action committee, or TRMPAC, is ongoing.

Earle's statement on the agreement includes a list of things corporations can and cannot do in Texas, and a promise that his office will keep reading the law this way. That caught the notice of the Professional Advocacy Association of Texas — the "lobby lobby" — which sent a memo to members suggesting they look note the prosecutor's reading of the law. Quoting from the press release:

• "There is no exception in Texas law for corporate employees or resources to be used to benefit campaigns for public office other than communications to a corporation’s own restricted class.

• "Under the law in Texas, there is no exception for de minimus activity funded by corporate resources. Any use of corporate resources of any nature to benefit a campaign for public office is a violation of the corporate prohibition, including the use of corporate facilities, corporate property, corporate employees or corporate expense reimbursement.

• "Any use of corporate resources to benefit a political action committee, other than for expenditures for the formation, administration or permissible class solicitation allowed by Chapter 253.100 of the Texas Election Code is prohibited.

• "Any corporate employee that wishes to donate his or her personal services to a candidate or political action committee must do so on his or her own personal time, which should be noted in advance and clearly documented in corporate records.

• "A corporation may not reimburse the expenses of a corporate employee who has taken personal time to engage in campaign activities. "

Republican Joan Huffman got an endorsement from Texans for Lawsuit Reform, which had said earlier it would stay out of the first round of the race to replace Kyle Janek in SD-17.

TLR had given money to one of the two Democrats in that race — Stephanie Simmons — but had left the four Republicans to their own devices.

Now, with factually challenged attacks from a political action committee attacking Huffman, the group decided to openly back her. The Best for Texas PAC sent mailers to 55,000 voters acusing Huffman of taking excessive time off while she was a state judge. As it turns out, their research was shoddy, and both their consultant, Allen Blakemore, and the candidate Blakemore consults, Austen Furse, apologized to Huffman.

They followed their apology by saying they weren't going to send correcting mailers, and by attacking Huffman for being "soft on crime" for accepting plea agreements from prosecutors in several child molestation cases.

The tort PAC said in its endorsement that it would be happy with either Simmons or Huffman in the Senate. They contributed $2,500 to Simmons in the last reporting period; a spokeswoman wouldn't say whether they've given to Huffman yet. The group also took a swipe at Democrat Chris Bell, the best-known candidate, as an ally of the trial lawyers TLR opposes. Bell's campaign said TLR is trying to push their guy into a runoff with Huffman.

The former senator from SD-17 calls bull on a PAC he funded that is supporting the candidate he has endorsed.

Austen Furse hit the email boxes with a list of endorsements in his bid for the SD-17 seat that includes former President George H. W. Bush, Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector Paul Bettencourt, former Harris County Judge Robert Eckels and others.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform joined Huffman's ranks earlier in the week. And the back-and-forth has reached a fever pitch, even dragging in former Sen. Kyle Janek, the Houston Republican whose early resignation set up next month's special election.

Furse and Huffman are trying to elbow their way into a runoff with Democrat Chris Bell, who is by most accounts the frontrunner in the race and the best-known of the six candidates. Since it's a special election and not a regular one, the winner has to get 50 percent, either on November 4 or in a runoff.

Janek's name has been invoked, since he gave his money to the Best for Texas PAC, which is in turn using that money to attack Huffman, first with the bogus vacation story and now with the "soft on crime" bit about child molesters. Houston consultant Allen Blakemore worked for Janek and now runs both the Best PAC and the Furse campaign. Asked about the skirmishes, Janek responded with a written reply:

"While I have not seen the ads or emails being discussed, I have been getting calls about them and I have heard the rumors.

"I know three things. The first is that any assertion that Judge Joan Huffman was soft on criminals, especially based on plea recommendations from the Harris County D.A.’s office, strikes me as ridiculous. The second is that Austen Furse (whom I have endorsed) and Joan Huffman are both very good people whom I respect and to whom I could entrust my kids. The third is that Allen Blakemore works to help Republicans, not Democrats – always has, always will.

"Actually, there is one more thing I know: hyperventilation is bad for the brain – it literally constricts the blood vessels that feed the grey matter. (Go ahead – Google it.)

"I wish that everyone would stand down on this nonsense."

Rasmussen has Cornyn and McCain well ahead in Texas.

U.S. Sen. John Cornyn leads Democrat Rick Noriega by 15 percentage points in the latest poll from Rasmussen Reports. That outfit had Cornyn at 55 percent and Noriega at 40 percent in a poll of 500 "likely voters" done on October 21. Their margin of error: +/- 4.5 percent.

The same pollster had the two candidates only seven points apart at the end of September. Earlier monthly surveys showed a wider split. Cornyn is viewed favorably by 59 percent of voters and unfavorably by 32 percent. The corresponding numbers for Noriega: 43 favorable, 42 unfavorable. And they say Cornyn leads 54 percent to 32 percent among the remaining undecided voters.

• The same pollsters have Republican John McCain ahead of Democrat Barack Obama in Texas, 54 percent to 44 percent. Just one percent of voters said they haven't decided on a candidate. That's about where the candidates have been since mid-summer, when a series of monthly polls showed them steady at nine points apart. The favorable/unfavorable breaks on the candidates for president among Texas voters: 66/33 for McCain, and 47/52 for Obama.

This mailer was sent by Empower Texas into the district where Democrat Joel Redmond is running against Republican Ken Legler. The Houston Chronicle's story on this is in our clips, but didn't include a picture of the mailer, below:

Incumbent Republican Sen. Kim Brimer goes up with a spot highlighting endorsements from family, public officials, and firefighters.

The race for HD-96 has Democrats almost ready to pull out the confetti and streamers for their candidate, Chris Turner. But the Republicans are confident that early voter turnout for incumbent Bill Zedler, R-Arlington, is giving Turner a run for his money.

"We're very confident, and I'm not just saying that," says Craig Murphy, Zedler's consultant. (Murphy says he recommended Zedler spend his time at the polls, not talking to the press, so we haven't heard back from the candidate.) "He's [Turner] on all the Democratic target lists, but if this is the quality of the Democratic target lists, they've got big problems this year."

Zedler was first elected in 2002. His last few Democratic challengers weren't well funded. Even so, Zedler won with only 52 percent of the vote to Democrat Chris Youngblood's 44 percent in 2006. This year, primary turnout for the Democrats in the district was more than double that of the Republicans. Based on those numbers, Democrats are opening their wallets for Turner. He's a first-time candidate, but isn't new to politics: Turner worked for former U.S. Rep. Martin Frost's staff and then went to work for U.S. Rep. Chet Edwards of Waco as a campaign manager and district director.

Zedler's people think Turner's all hype.

"The biggest problem for Turner is that it's a Republican district, and he's a former political consultant," Murphy says. "That's not really the background people are looking for. They want someone who has had a real job — a doctor or a teacher or a businessperson."

"I was able to work on the government side on a number of issues," says Turner of his work with Edwards. "The experience of having been involved in his office has been nothing but positive in my race."

Democratic consultant Matt Angle says he wouldn't call Turner a consultant, because he was a member of Edwards' staff (That's a fine line: The Turner Group, a political consultancy, is paid $7,000 a month by the Texas Democratic Trust, run by Angle. Lisa Turner, the principal, is the candidate's wife). Angle says he's known quite a few candidates that worked on campaigns before running for office.

"It depends on the individual," Angle says. "If you're a good candidate, that experience can be pretty valuable."

It hasn't hurt the bank. Turner raised $240,166 from January to the end of June, and $195,046 from July to the end of September. He had about $184,464 in cash at the end of September. Zedler raised $83,790 from January to June, and then $125,509 from July to Sept. He reported $134,160 cash on hand.

Turner has the Fort Worth Star-Telegram's support (they don’t endorse, they recommend). And until we brought it their attention Tuesday, Zedler was claiming on his website that the paper is with him. He had it in ’06, and for this year’s primary. But he doesn't now, and he pulled down the reference.

Both candidates are talking about primary election turnout.

The Turner campaign has capitalized on record turnout in the primary. Democrats in HD-96 outnumbered Republicans about 2.5 to 1.

Murphy says Turner has "made a career" out of using those numbers, and he thinks it's worthless now because it only reflected the tension within the Democratic Party over the presidential candidates.

"That doesn't change the dynamics of the district," Murphy says. "He [Turner] would have had more success running in the last election, when Republican turnout was sort of depressed," says.

There's no way to know party breakdown of early voting, but the Republicans in Tarrant County seem to be confident. Murphy believes only about a third of the people who showed up for the first day of early voting were Democrats.

"We get a list everyday of who has voted, and where they voted," says Stephanie Klick, chair of the Tarrant County GOP, "and we're encouraged."

But Turner says the dynamics of the district are in his favor. Like other suburban sprawls in the state, parts of Tarrant County are filled with new subdivisions of lower-cost housing, bringing younger and more racially diverse families, which Turner says makes for a more competitive district.

The candidates have faced off in two forums, and taxes were the subject both emphasized. Turner says Zedler wants to increase the sales tax to 13 percent and use the money to replace property taxes.

"That's why Turner's losing this race," says Murphy, who contends a Democrat could never win a political debate about taxes.

Zedler's campaign has been all over Turner on taxes and is trying to link him with presidential candidate Barack Obama in mail pieces. One says Turner supports Obama's plan to increase taxes, because "Turner's boss, Democrat Chet Edwards, was considered a Vice Presidential Pick for Barak Obama." Angle calls Zedler campaign mailers "blatantly false" and "clumsily cited."

"This is one of the Democrats best opportunities to win," says Angle, "and Zedler is in a full-blown panic. He's done nothing but put out attack pieces. "

Murphy says Zedler's got no reason to panic: "This is a year that Republicans are going to come out and vote."

—by Karie Meltzer

The latest twist on the Pete Olson Mystery Voter Saga comes from his old boss, U.S. Sen. John Cornyn.

This started, you'll remember, with voter records in Connecticut that show Olson voting there while he was registered to vote in Virginia.

The statement: "Our records indicate that Pete Olson was working in the Senator's Washington office on August 12, 2003. Senator Cornyn knows Pete as a person of the utmost integrity. He believes this type of desperate mud-slinging against a man who has dedicated his career to serving our country and the people of Texas has absolutely no place in this election."

A spokesman for Cornyn said they've got email records that indicate Olson was in the office and then went to Texas on official business that day.

Meanwhile, the Olson camp says they got one Houston TV station to pull ads on that voting issue bought by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee on behalf of Nick Lampson's campaign.